Method & Music: Jake Adam York’s “Knoxville Girl”
<<<Back to page 2
Satan is Real
When I mentioned to Ken I wanted to write about Yorkâs poem and about the Louvin Brothersâ knotty history, he sent me his copy of Satan is Real, a memoir co-written by Charlie Louvin and Benjamin Whitmer. The book recounts much of the Louvin Brothersâ childhood and provides sufficient testimony to conclude that the boys had their own troubled lives to bring to their music. York was mostly right â they learned âKnoxville Girlâ from their mother, who also taught them what Charlie said was the first song they ever learned by heart, another murder ballad, âMary of the Wild Moor.â They learned these songs when they were little boys helping inside with housework because they werenât old enough to work outside with their father. Itâs too bad they couldnât stay little.
We only have to read a few pages of the book before weâre into accounts of whippings and beatings doled out by Papa, who was, by Charlieâs telling, hard on both brothers but harder on Ira. The tales of the beatings are gruesome â difficult to read. So too are other passages of the book, including one in which Charlie recalls a coon hound in heat trapped in the loft of their barn. His father was saving her to breed with another coon hound, but Charlie and Ira hauled a bulldog up and watched the dogs go at it. When the puppies were born, their father ordered Charlie to shove the whole litter in a burlap sack. âPapa had no feeling for any animal at all,â Charlie writes. âIf it was worthless, then it didnât deserve to eatâŚ..if that dog failed, if Papa took it out and it wouldnât hunt, heâd just pick up an ax, say âCome here, boy,â and split its head right down the middle.â
Charlie and Iraâs uncle, it seems, was more violent than their father. âHe spent three quarters of his life in prison,â Charlie claims. âHell, he died in prison. Every time he would get out, he would do something stupid like carry some little teenage girl across a state line, and get ten more years for it.â
As for Charlie and Ira, they managed their lives in different ways. Charlie was married to the same woman for 61 years, but Ira seemed to ruin (or try to ruin) every relationship he had. He drank too much. Some wonder if he drank so much because he ignored a calling to preach. Charlie acknowledged this in the memoir, but he also suspected Iraâs problems had more to do with the beatings he got as a boy. Ira went through four wives. One of them shot him six times after he tried to strangle her with a telephone cord. He lived, but his drinking took a toll on more than his marriages. By 1963, it ruined his partnership with his brother. Two years later, he died in a car accident. If you try to balance the gospel-themed concept albums the brothers recorded with the murder ballads they loved, it seems something tips toward darkness, at least as that measure applies to Ira.
In a chapter titled âTragic Songs of Life,â titled after the brothersâ first full-length album with Capitol Records, Charlie discusses the popularity of âThe Knoxville Girlâ and explains his own understanding of the song. The reason why Willie kills the girl is clear, he asserts: she had âdark and roving eyes.â The roving eyes, of course, are what matters, and though the explanation, embedded in the song as it is, feels almost hidden, itâs available to anyone who listens with some attention.
âOf course, Willie doesnât get away with it,â Charlie writes. âThatâs the way of it, as Ira and I learned at an early age from Papa, you donât get away with nothing. He goes home and loses his mind. He sees the flames of hell all around him, and spends the rest of his life in a dirty old jail cell.â Charlie knew something about the misery of getting caught. The book is full of his tales of trouble and reproof.
Method Acting
All of this raises questions about the imperative for an artist to enter other and the degree to which the Louvin Brothers were method actors or, more specifically, method musicians. In covering âThe Knoxville Girl,â The Louvin Brothers, by some necessity of lyrics, channeled a killer. York dramatizes and exploits that channeling in his poem, erasing the gauzy barrier between singer and song. The poem fascinates me because of the questions it spawns: were the Louvin Brothers, because of their early introduction to murder ballads, always trying to live up to or into those songs, or did their lives prepare them for their performances? Perhaps more simply put, did they become the roles they sang?
In a 2014 article in The New Yorker, Richard Brody writes, âThereâs something about modern-day acting â that style that is famously associated with Lee Strasbergâs Method and that gained currency from his Actors Studio and its offshoots â that inclines toward deformations of character.â Later, writing about Philip Seymour Hoffman, Brody notes, âThe connection of his inner life and outer skill generated a sort of emotional short circuit that overheated him terrifyingly, resulting in the justly admired intensity that he brought to every role.â Hoffman died of acute mixed drug intoxication when he was 46. Investigators found a syringe stuck in his arm. Some wonder if his devotion to acting asked too much of him. Itâs possible to ask a similar question about the Louvin Brothersâ commitment to music.
Lee Strasberg took Constantin Stanislavskyâs imperative for âbelievable truthâ and honed it into his Method, urging actors to summon real experiences from their real lives. Stanislavsky, before Strasberg, urged something similar when he encouraged actors to prepare for roles by recalling emotions from their lives. At the core of Method acting is a belief that in order to convincingly play a character, an actor must live the character. The result of this mirrored living is, for those who believe in the Method approach, sincerity.
A method actor doesnât leave his role behind him on stage, so what he does on stage is not, as some would say, fabrication. The Louvins, in this way, were very much like method actors. They didnât pretend to understand misery. They brought their own emotional history to the songs they sang.
Stanislavsky and Strasberg wanted to bridge the gap between life and theater, but at what expense? The Louvin Brothers â particularly Ira â were haunted by trauma and violence. They didnât have to build the bridge, but what was the cost of maintaining it? Yorkâs poem addresses this cost and works as a kind of autopsy, slicing open the Louvinsâ recording, examining cause and effect, and discovering something new.
We know of actors who take method acting seriously, and we know of actors who take method acting too far. A 2015 article in Mental Floss lists 15 of the most outrageous examples. Jack Nicholson lived at the psychiatric ward where One Flew Over the Cuckooâs Nest was shot. He mingled with patients and participated in group therapy sessions. Some of those sessions were filmed without patientsâ knowledge. Billy Bob Thornton (who, incidentally, sang âKnoxville Girlâ with Charlie Louvin at a show one night in Nashville) put crushed glass inside his shoes to help him walk with the kind of gait necessary for his role in Sling Blade. Ira Louvin sometimes smashed his mandolin on stage. Was that, in some way, method acting that went too far?
Songs of Life
Charlie and Ira Louvin loved those tragic songs of life, but Charlie, it seems, was able to get outside of them. He understood their tragedy, but he acknowledged that the tragedies of most old murder ballads are of a different scale than the tragedies we read about today. In his chapter about tragic songs, he writes, âYou can talk about âKnoxville Girlâ being a tragic song, but it only talks about the death of one person. Today the death of one person wouldnât even make the newsâŚ.as far at the news items go, ten people barely matter, and one donât count at all.â
Charlie Louvin died in 2011 of complications from pancreatic cancer. He was 83. Jake Adam York died in 2012 after a massive stroke. He was 40. Though I understand what Charlie Louvin was after when he angled toward a redefinition of contemporary tragedy, Yorkâs death counts. So does Charlieâs. So does Iraâs. There was something tragic in each. York died too young, Charlie knew more than a manâs share of cruelty, and Ira (who also knew more than a manâs share of cruelty) never settled into a life that seemed to work. About Ira, Charlie wrote, âThe worldly things were just too strong for him. He couldnât overcome them long enough to be what he knew he ought to be, and that made his entire life a buildup of the misery in his mind.â
At the end of his essay in Terrain.org, York confesses, âI hope that somehow I too can blend my voice with the bygone, in the ghost choruses of culture, and yet raise it when called to answer, to be able to say, with strength, âIâve got my own way of talking,â yet listen rightly, if the voice that gives me voice should say, in some way, Go do my will.â That essay was published in 2006, a year after Yorkâs Murder Ballads was published. Iâd say by then York already had blended his voice with the bygone and raised it too. His âKnoxville Girlâ both acknowledges its roots in the Louvinsâ song and declares its independence from the song.