Murder Ballad MondayThe limits of empathy
mbm-header

Comments

The limits of empathy — 2 Comments

  1. Thanks for your comment. I agree — I don’t the song is about a blind rage on the part of Hollis Brown. But I do think it is, in the end, about a certain blindness — on our part I guess — because the song won’t walk us through the final moments. I mean, I have a real question about this: if you’re going to have empathy for what a man or woman has done, don’t you need to be able to look at what he or she has actually done — or is your own imagination of what was done enough? If so, well, that’s a limit to empathy right there, isn’t it? “Enough for what?,” is, I guess, the larger question.

    (I come down firmly on one side of the answer, just personally. My answer is yes, you need to take a look. See, for example, my imagination imagines you’d need to work up a bit of rage in that final moment to go through with it, but maybe not, maybe not.)

  2. “(Unless you think that perhaps this is all that Hollis Brown actually himself saw in the final moment? Is this an instance of blind rage or other blind emotion? Discuss.)”

    Hmm, I’m not sure I would say it was a “blind” anything. I view it as Hollis Brown being calculating and cold (although, of course, there is the double-edge of “only killing them cause I love them” factor) and completely aware of what he is doing. And I certainly don’t see him as enraged. Perhaps post-enraged and now hopeless, but the tone of the song to me doesn’t indicate an active, involved action of killing people in the heat of the moment but instead a passive, resigned action of succumbing to God’s tough world. His killings seem to be mercy killings if anything, saving his children from the future hardships that they are helpless to escape.

    Perhaps this is why I tend to favor the slower, sadder versions (Nina, Neville) over the angry versions. I do love the Rise Against version but couldn’t really get into the Nazareth or Entombed versions for some reason.