FLECK and WASHBURN: Bela Fleck and Abigail Washburn
Fleck and Washburn
Bela Fleck and Abigail Washburn
Rounder Records
When I first heard that Bela Fleck and Abigail Washburn had married I thought it was a joke, though that was in part because of the source of the news. The âBluegrass Intelligencer,â a satire web magazine, ran the story under the headline âStrategic marriage will consolidate power within single banjo sovereignty: Fleck, Washburn promise male heir, Holy Banjo Emperor.â A faux anonymous source close to the couple is quoted as saying that the future bride and groom âbarely detest each other at all.â
Of course, the article was meant in fun even if there was a truth behind it. Which, as it turns out, there was. Yet, when Fleck and Washburn did in fact marry (theyâve also since had a male child, Juno, born last year) it still felt like someone was pulling our legs. As musicians, they have often seemed to be singing from different hymnals, so to speak.
Fleck is known, rightly, for a very complex, heady approach to the banjo, one based in the kind of precision that we associate more with classical musicians than, well, anyone else. Sometimes it works, as in an early recording that is now a classic, Fiddle Tunes for the Banjo, with Tony Trischka and Bill Keith. Fleckâs timing and precision, as well as his musical intuitions, really burnish the work to a sparkling sheen.
In other instances, that academic kind of approach doesnât work as well. Fleckâs symphonic piece âThe Imposter,â one reviewer noted âfeels as if Fleck worried the piece into existence. It’s too fastidious, and it never really soars.â If there is anything to fault in Fleckâs playing, itâs that inability to really loosen up, to relinquish a bit of precision in the service of feel, especially in settings such as jazz and swing that simply require it. In Ray Charles famous formula, âgenius + soul = jazz,â though having soul, despite the apparent genius, is not something itâs easy to accuse Fleck of. In his work with the Marcus Roberts Trio, his accompaniment and solos float like oil in a vinaigrette dressing — theyâre there, but they never really combine or take the flavor of the rest of the mix.
Washburn, while not as technically robust, brings a rich, immersive emotion to everything she does. She crept into the Americana mainstream through old-time music, rising to attention as a member of Uncle Earl, a group in which she demonstrated her ability as a singer and banjo player as well as her willingness to take risks in the service of reaching an audience. During sets with Uncle Earl sheâd include a song in Mandarin, sometimes accompanying herself on banjo, and others, as in a translation of Gillian Welchâs âWinterâs Come and Gone,â with an old-time accompaniment. Because many in the audiences in those days didnât know that she had lived in China and speaks Mandarin fluently, the idea, when first presented, felt put on, or showy, or just ill advised. Then she showed us why it wasnât. She regularly brought audiences to their feet, perhaps none of whom had any idea what she had sung, let alone why. The emotion, and the power in her voice, was captivating and moving. Where Fleck wants us to listen to him, Washburn wants to speak to us.
That contrast animates their first album of duets, titled simply Bela Fleck and Abigail Washburn. The first track is an example of Washburnâs fearlessness: she opens with a reworking of âIâve Been Working on the Railroad.â Itâs hard to conceive of such a thing not seeming trite, and placing it as the first track has a whiff of bravado about it. She gives it her best, but it canât avoid feeling self-conscious. The arrangement is set in a minor key, which feels like a feint toward adding depth. Fleck only adds to the tension, most noticeably when he inserts a few bars of the melody of âOh Suzanna.â Itâs campy and hard to bear. The political flourish at the endââone day Iâll own this railroad, and everyone will ride for freeââcomes out of left field and feels like another feint at adding thematic depth.
There, as elsewhere, the presentation is overly muscular and the album doesnât find its emotional core until the fifth track, âNew South Africa,â which is, frankly, breathtaking. Itâs an instrumental piece pitting Washburn on one side, Fleck on the other, as they work through a composition that Fleck first recorded with the Flecktones in 1995. Here, itâs the musical equivalent of a mid-afternoon discussion over coffeeâplayful, light, comfortable, a moment away from the rush of the day. It works because it allows both players to express their own character and to retain their own voices – Fleck with his runs and complex chords; Washburn bringing in a lovely old-time claw hammer banjo – as they circle effortlessly, joyfully, and at times impishly around a number of musical ideas. There are other highlights too, including another instrumental, âBanjo, Banjo,â and a reworking of âAnd Am I Born to Dieâ which pays a direct tribute to Doc Watson and his take on the song.
But, in all, there is more here that doesnât work than does, in part because they are trying to do too much. Instead of settling into a room and exploring it, they want to tour the whole building. In an earlier time, say even just twenty years ago, this album would have been the first of two or even three, or at least have been pared and edited in order to describe a clearer narrative arc across the album. An instrumental album would be nice, and âRailroad,â âBye, Bye Babyâ and âFor the Childrenâ suggest how nice a childrenâs album could be especially when framed as such. By focusing things a bit, theyâd allow themselves the time to really settle into and explore specific musical areas, and to unpack them, to turn them over, and to work through them at a more leisurely pace.
These days, however, there isnât the industry to support such a long view. Nor are there producers in the studio anymore giving suggestions as to what to try and what to tweak, what to include and what to leave off. We tend to sneer at that idea, believing that the musicians are the best judges of what to do. But, had it not been for Norman Granz in the studio, Oscar Peterson wouldnât have written âHymn to Freedom.â Likewise, there are reasons that people hire T Bone Burnett. Sometimes there is a benefit to having someone with an objective perspective weighing in and providing direction.
Given the approach, as well as the admission that the album was made in order to allow the two to spend more time with their infant child, – it was literally recorded around feedings and rest – there is a risk of the fiction upstaging the reality. Theyâve been marketed, including in the radio spots for their one Canadian tour stop in support of this album, as âthe unofficial first family of the banjo.â We need a first family of the banjo, official or otherwise, as much as we need a holy banjo emperor, though it seems we now have both: those are Junoâs giggles at the end of the album, styling the final punctuation in the form of a birth announcement. Hakuna matata, yâall!
— Glen Herbert